Defending The New World Translation

This website identifies and disputes false charges made against The New World Translation. Find what you are looking for either by using the search box or by clicking the links directly below.

Friday, October 21, 2016

The “New World Translation”—Scholarly and Honest

›
Back in the 16th century, opposers said that Martin Luther’s translation of the Bible was "FULL of falsifications!” They believe...
Sunday, September 29, 2013

Luke 23:43 - Punctuation and the New World Translation; "Truly I tell you today,..."

›
On occasion, opposers of Jehovah's Witnesses  attempt to attack the scholarship and honesty of the translators of the New World Trans...
Monday, September 16, 2013

Why Does the New World Translation Use the Word “Impaled” where Most Bible Translations Say Christ Was “Crucified”?

›
Most Bible translations say Christ was “crucified” rather than “impaled.” This is because of the common belief that the torture instrumen...
Thursday, September 12, 2013

Why Does the New World Translation Bible Say, "God's Active Force" at Genesis 1:2?

›
In the New World Translation (NWT) Bible, it says at Genesis 1:2, "Now the earth proved to be formless and waste and there was ...
Thursday, August 8, 2013

Is the New World Translation the only Bible to phrase John 1:1c as "the Word was A God"?

›
"Is the New World Translation the only Bible to phrase John 1:1c as "the Word was *a* God"?" Consider the foll...
Thursday, April 18, 2013

Addressing The Claim That The New World Translation is "Biased"

›
Some have made claims similar to the quote found in p. 65, Understanding Jehovah's Witnesses , Baker Book House, 1991, that, "th...
Sunday, April 14, 2013

Why was the New World Translation Bible Printed, and How Accurate is it?

›
Why was the New World Translation Bible Printed? There were several reasons why the NWT was printed: 1) Most of the other translat...
›
Home
View web version

About Me

Elijah Daniels
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.